Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1996: The climatology of relative humidity in the atmosphere. Journal of Climate, 9(12), 3443-3463.
Abstract: The present paper deals with the analysis of the time-average
relative humidity fields in the atmosphere. Twice-daily estimates of relative
humidity are used.
After some theoretical considerations on the relations between relative
humidity, other moisture parameters, and temperature, a critical analysis
of the various sources of data is made considering their possible limitations.
Various methods of computing relative humidity are formulated and discussed.
The global distribution of relative humidity at various levels shows that
it is not zonally uniform with centers of various intensities at all latitudes.
The global maps show maxima in the equatorial zone and minima in the dry
subtropical belts around 30°N and 30°S. The land-sea contrast
and variations related to the orographic relief are also apparent. The
general pattern of relative humidity is similar at all levels but its magnitude
decreases with altitude. The seasonal analyses show a similar pattern as
the annual analyses but are slightly shifted toward the summer pole.
The saturation deficit is also evaluated. Cross sections of the saturation
deficit show that the maxima are found in the middle to lower troposphere
at subtropical latitudes, being most intense in the Northern Hemisphere
during the summer season.
The temporal variability of the relative humidity due to transient eddies
exhibits a bimodal structure with maxima in the midlatitudes of each hemisphere
around 700 mb. The stationary eddy distributions are less pronounced than
the transient ones and do not change substantially from one season to another.
To validate our results, several comparisons are made using independent
sources of humidity data as well as cloud distributions at various levels.
Thus, COADS data are used to obtain independent analyses of the surface
relative humidity over the oceans, and satellite observations by SAGE are
used at the 300-mb level. The rawinsonde-SAGE differences are on the order
of 10% in the Tropics and 20% in the high latitudes, due in part to a clear-sky
(dry) bias in the SAGE data. Our results are further compared with those
obtained from operational analyses by the ECMWF. The differences do not
exceed 5% in the Tropics but tend to be larger in the tropical upper troposphere
and at all levels in the extratropics of the Southern Hemisphere, where
the radiosonde network is quite sparse. In view of the obvious connections
between the moisture distribution in the atmosphere and cloudiness, a cloud
climatology is used to check its consistency with the present results.
The latitudinal and interseasonal variations of cloudiness and relative
humidity are similar, with maxima in the equatorial belt and at high latitudes
and minima in the subtropics that shift poleward during summer and equatorward
during winter.
Finally, some comments are made on the radiosonde-observing systems in
the light of recent satellite studies of humidity. Mainly at the upper
levels systematic localized differences are found between electrical hygristor
and organic sensors, but the differences almost disappear in the middle
and lower troposphere.
In spite of the shortcomings, limitations, and errors of the radiosonde
network, the present analyses describe for the first time the large-scale,
three-dimensional characteristics of the relative humidity in the global
atmosphere.