Rosati, A., and K. Miyakoda, 1988: A general circulation model for
upper ocean simulation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18(11),
1601-1626.
Abstract: A general circulation model (GCM) of the ocean that
emphasizes the simulation of the upper ocean has been developed. This emphasis
is in keeping with its future intent, that of an air-sea coupled model.
The basic model is the primitive equation model of Bryan and Cox with the
additions, of optional usage, of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 turbulence
closure scheme and horizontal nonlinear viscosity. These modifications
are intended to improve the upper ocean simulations, particularly sea surface
temperature and heat content. The horizontal grid spacing is 1° latitude
x 1° longitude and is global in domain. The equatorial region between
10°N and 10°S is further refined in the north-south direction
to 1/3° resolution. There are 12 vertical levels, with six levels
in the top 70 m. The model incorporates varying bottom topography.
Prior to coupling the ocean model to an atmospheric GCM, experiments have
been carried out to determine the ocean GCM's performance using atmospheric
forcing from observed data. The data source was the National Meteorological
Center twice daily 1000 mb analysis for winds, temperature, and relative
humidity for 1982 and 1983. From these data, wind stress and total heat
flux were calculated from bulk formulas and used as surface boundary conditions
for the ocean model.
The response of the ocean GCM to mixing parameterization schemes and frequency
of atmospheric forcing have been examined. In particular, the use of constant
eddy coefficients for both horizontal and vertical mixing (A-model) versus
nonlinear horizontal viscosity and turbulence closure schemes (E-model)
have been examined, along with comparisons of monthly mean versus 12-hourly
forcing. It was found that, in general, the E-physics produces a more realistic
mixed-layer structure as compared to A-physics. Using the monthly mean
values produces sea surface temperatures that are too warm, presumably
because the evaporative flux, which is proportional to the wind speed,
is underestimated. The 12-h forcing improves appreciably both the A and
E model since the heat flux is better represented; the E-case shows an
even greater improvement due to its sensitivity to wind stirring. The near
surface heat budget, along with more traditional variables, is examined
for a short period during the 1982-83 El Niño event. These results
are encouraging considering the many possible sources of error, including
those in forcing data, initial conditions, radiative fluxes, and bulk exchange
coefficients.